This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Hi there all,


I have the following problem:


I got 6 cs servers on a dual amd , load is good, running linux kernel 2.6.8. When i 
look in hlsw, i got timeouts of 20 secs every 15 secs. When i look at my traffic, the 
box is doing +- 120 kb/s with no players online. The timeouts in HLSW i fixed with the 
max_queries_sec, max_queries_sec_global & the max_queries_window (6.0 / 60 / 
120)commands but the traffic doesn't go away, it does +- 16 gig's a day, and nobody is 
playing on the servers.
All the servers have a standard config. nothing special.

When i look at my tcpdump, then i see many, many requests to the cs servers. example: 
"16:38:52.479694 IP masked.1890 > masked.27015: UDP, length: 11

I reinstalled the boxes yesterday,gave the servers new ip numbers, and after +- 12 
hours, its starting again. The servers are completly updated. They are all running 
slackware 10.0, with kernel 2.6.8.

If the servers are turned off, still there is communication between the box and all 
kind of ip numbers. Its all hlds related:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# tcpdump -i eth0 udp >> logfile01
3164 packets captured
3164 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cat logfile01 |wc -l
3165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# /usr/local/bin/ifstat -i eth0
eth0
KB/s in KB/s out
16.57 16.28
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/#

Another strange thing is, to make sure slackware 10 & kernel 2.6 isnt the problem, is 
that a box that was running redhat 9, with a 2.4 kernel, was having the same problems.

By the way, other servers in the same ip range, and on the same switch, are not having 
this problems!

http://83.98.146.100/hlsw-traffic.jpg


Kinds regards and thanks in advance for the reply's!


Michel

PS: Sorry if you guys receive this mail 2 times.
--


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to