----- Original Message -----
From: "OoksServer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] OT: Belkin replacement.


>
>
> > Any thoughts on the Linksys *BEFSR41?  It seems to have got a lot of
> > good reviews, I only need to connect two PCs and a wireless hub to it
> > and the traffic is only high when I push large or lots of work related
> > files around.  The delight of a small home office.... :)
> >
> > Stephen
>
> I used to have one. It came off of the shelf defective. Either that, or
the
> firmware was buggy. In retrospect, I now believe it was the firmware that
> was crap, and not the unit itself. Some of the guys I worked with had the
> same model, and all of use had problems with it rebooting itself on a
> regular basis.
>
> The number of ports you can forward is limited, and you can't assign IPs
to
> specific mac addresses. The reason I bought my Linksys is that by using
> sveasoft or similar firmware, you can have these and many more features.
>
> This seems to be a common problem. Netgear released a firmware a few
months
> ago that caused regular reboots, and dLink released a firmware that caused
> reboots every 5-10 minutes. This isn't rocket science - why can't they get
> their act together with the firmware? My Cisco never rebooted - it ran
24/7
> for months and months.
>

I might mention, that I'm so sick of these low end crap routers that can't
run a week without rebooting or that have weird issues or limited
functionality, that I'm ready to fork out the bucks for a good Cisco. The
irritation factor is such that it's becoming worth $600-$800 for a good SOHO
cisco router. I need it for a low traffic home office - a web server, a
Until URU server, two half-life servers, mama reads email, etc. I just need
some friggin' quality, fer cryin' out loud!


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to