Buffer them for a day then? You don't see the benefit from this? Let's say those magots make a new cheat.. test it.. and it goes through VAC2; They now have a working cheat for thousands to download without the fear, right?
Unless VAC2 will be updated without notice? I still stand by my idea, but maybe between updates is too long. -Alex -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BoNfiRe Sent: 30. mars 2005 12:46 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [hlds] Suggestion for VAC2. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:14 AM Subject: Re: [hlds] Suggestion for VAC2. > Personally I want cheaters banned as soon as they join the server, > none of this 'checking' stuff. > I will second that no pint in giving these ppl a timaeframe to cheat, and IMO I can't see the difference between the threat of being banned as soon as you join to being banned a week later. The fear is there and giving them a week gives them a chance to anoy people while your waitng for the next update to get them banned. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexander Kobbevik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 8:02 PM > Subject: [hlds] Suggestion for VAC2. > > >> I been away from this list for a while and after seeing the last >> update notice I ran back. >> >> Can I make a suggestion for VAC2, please? >> >> I know its only fair to warn before inserting a new system that will >> try > to >> catch cheaters. >> I also know that it's the right way to do it when you are acctually >> trying to get more players, and not less. >> >> But, here goes. >> >> What if you update VAC2... but only record cheats until the next >> update. Then you ban the collected list and start a new recording >> after the new > VAC2 >> update. >> This way you create a fear for cheating... which is one of the most >> successfull ways of stopping people from trying to cheat... >> >> They can't just have someone else check if the cheat gets detected >> first, then use it until the next VAC2 update. >> >> To me this sounds like a really good idea, but it popped up an hour >> ago while reading the archive.. so maybe I missed some side affect... >> >> If people comment on this idea, maybe valve will consider it? >> >> >> -Alexander >> [GNIZ] >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >> archives, > please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >> > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
