I prefer firedaemon as well, but both tools have there plus's.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Payton Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 3:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [hlds] Firedaemon x Serverdoc I like firedaemon personally, and I haven't had any problems with it. Plus I like being able to stop running it as a service from the command line, which is what I do when a new update comes out (got a batch file actaully - kills the service, updates, then restarts the service). I don't think you can do that with serverdoc (but I'm not sure, haven't used it in a few years). Rick Payton, IT Support Morikawa & Associates (808) 572-1745 http://www.mai-hawaii.com/ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edson Sossai Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 9:23 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [hlds] Firedaemon x Serverdoc Which one of those is better to have your server up ad running all the time? I had a few issues using FD but in the other hand serverdoc does not work as a service. Or using both by setting up FD to run serverdoc and then to run HLDS would be the best option? _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
