MS themselves say that there is no way for us to know how much of any process is in RAM and how much is in the pagefile, so, I don't know where you're getting this information from. Besides, *everything* is in virtual memory. And there is no point in keeping pages in RAM that aren't being accessed when that RAM could be actively used for some other purpose. If pages are active, they'll be in RAM, don't worry about it.
On 8/12/05, dexion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wondering about something. I have all windows2003 boxes and run > multiple instances of hlds and srcds. I notice for instance that if I run x > bumber of servers I am using 1.6 gigs of ram total, but only about 1000 of > that would be in the actual physical ram. The rest is is virtual. I have 2 > gigs of ram per box. My question would be, is there any performance gain in > trying to push more of the hlds/srcds process into physical ram? I dont > really experience any problems, but I would like to use the ram as opposed > the virtual since I have it why not use it if there is a benefit. Would > the -heapsize switch help since I do not use it? Anyone out there know how > to get windows to be more sparing with the virtual and push more into > physical ram? Why would the os want to use any virtual since im under the > physical ram in the first place? Seems silly. > tia > dex > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- Clayton Macleod >get ye flask You cannot get ye flask. _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
