-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I've seen many cheats in Source, but they do seem much fewer lately.
The one where players would spin around in circles and constantly get head shots was even more obvious than most cheats. When Beetle's mod added checks for cvars used in common cheats, a lot of players on the server I play on got banned until either the cheats were updated or discontinued. On 9/8/05, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > VAC works great in Source, we see no cheats, we do not receive cheat > reports, and if we do get the occasional one, its just a disgruntled user > who been beaten by somebody good. Cheating as far as I can tell does not > exist in Source. > VAC on CS 1.6 on the other hand does not appear to be doing anything to > limit the amount of cheats in VAC secured servers. We can join any of our > CS > 1.6 servers and quickly spot multiple blatant cheats, (speedhacks, shakey > screen bots, blatant not even bothering to try and hide it wallhacks, > spinbots), we receive numerous cheat reports daily, the cheating on CS > 1.6has not been affected whatsoever in CS > 1.6. > That is the state of play as I currently see it. > > On 9/9/05, sprout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > eh I agree vac2 is crap its not working at all as planned > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 9:27 PM > > Subject: [hlds] Vac2 - Proff positive? > > > > > > > Ok, I am NOT trolling (at least not intentionally). I am very curious > as > > > to > > > whether you, the serious server admins, think that VAC2 is working as > > > promised or what your general opinion of VAC2 is? The reason I am > asking > > > is > > > that a lot of people I know stopped playing STEAM games due to the > > rampant > > > cheating. I know I can get some people back if I can convince them > that > > > things are better now. > > > > > > FYI: I stopped running a server about a year ago due to this problem > and > > > am > > > contemplating starting a new one for DOD:S. Your input is very > important > > > to > > > that decision. > > > > > > Thanks in advance... RR > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
