-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Problem solved On 9/30/05, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wish that was the case, thanks for trying though. > Here is a status list with names / steamID / IP:Port removed as they > don't seem to be the basis of the sort order either > > # > > userid > > connected > > ping > > loss > > state > > # > > 638 > > 47:14:00 > > 75 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 671 > > 20:26 > > 47 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 630 > > 55:11:00 > > 58 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 682 > > 07:30 > > 68 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 626 > > 01:02:55 > > 80 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 675 > > 16:26 > > 72 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 639 > > 46:46:00 > > 57 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 659 > > 28:36:00 > > 54 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 673 > > 18:14 > > 81 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 670 > > 20:43 > > 64 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 664 > > 24:32:00 > > 116 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 649 > > 43:39:00 > > 86 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 686 > > 00:39 > > 100 > > 64 > > spawning > > # > > 684 > > 06:05 > > 79 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 647 > > 44:17:00 > > 132 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 623 > > 01:09:11 > > 46 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 676 > > 15:21 > > 79 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 567 > > 02:09:16 > > 78 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 618 > > 01:14:56 > > 47 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 613 > > 01:17:35 > > 82 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 589 > > 01:44:57 > > 53 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 681 > > 08:36 > > 136 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 382 > > 05:36:35 > > 81 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 662 > > 26:06:00 > > 63 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 665 > > 23:14 > > 79 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 611 > > 01:21:00 > > 72 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 650 > > 42:23:00 > > 85 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 678 > > 11:19 > > 57 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 680 > > 08:58 > > 91 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 666 > > 23:08 > > 66 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 646 > > 45:05:00 > > 78 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 619 > > 01:13:50 > > 72 > > 0 > > active > > # > > 685 > > 05:44 > > 117 > > 0 > > active > Thanks James > > > On 9/30/05, James Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > IIRC (not currently connected to steam, not on a lan) it's in connection > > order, FIFO style, however free PID's can be re-used. I believe this is > > the order of the list. > > > > the player id (or whatever it's called) is just an arbritrary number > > which will not be duplicated during one mapcycle whilst it is in use by > > another player on that server. > > > > Whisper wrote: > > > -- > > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > > What is the sort order for SRCDS rcon status command > > > From what I can tell there is no sort order > > > If there is one, can somebody explain it to me? > > > If there is not one, can we at least have rcon status display by > > userID > > > order? > > > Thanks > > > -- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > --
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
