Top stuff guys, thanks a lot!

- Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred Reynolds
Sent: Saturday, 21 January 2006 11:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: Servers losing VAC, gettin beyond a joke...

Thanks for everyone that responded to my request, the information that I
got allowed me to track down the problem. There is a bug on startup that
can cause a server to go insecure that we are working on a fix for (if
the server fails to connect to the VAC2 backend on its first attempt
then the server is wrongly forced into insecure mode even if it can
later connect).

- Alfred

Ian mu wrote:
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Too true! I doubt there's be much to see anyway apart from the same
> message
> when it can't connect on startup though, at least thats "more"
> replicable as
> I seem to get that quite frequent.
>
> Like others, happy to help with any tracing/debugging if needed.
>
>
> On 1/20/06, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> --
>> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>> A watched VAC enabled server never goes insecure :(
>>
>> On 1/20/06, Ian mu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> --
>>> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>>> Have this mainly on windows (pretty sure we've had it on linux as
>>> well, just less css servers on it).
>>>
>>> Notice it more on a restart, server starts up, goes secure for a
>>> few secs, then message unable to contact (steam/valve/auth servers
>>> whatever it is), then goes secure 0. Normally on another restart
>>> its the same for me, but after a few variations in time on restart
>>> it ends up fine. It's different servers each time and different
>>> boxes, so no specifics and I doubt config etc.
>>>
>>> Maybe there's just too much traffic hitting certain boxes at
>>> certain times and it times out or something? If there's a pool, can
>>> it try one server, if no response try a different one or something
>>> ? Thats the way it feels anyway.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:55:47, Dan Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> At 09:06 PM 1/19/2006 -0500, Ray wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Exactly my point, nothing is in the logs and the server isn't
>>>>> crashed so their's no dump. The bottom line is it's impossible
>>>>> for us to help you fix what's broken.
>>>>
>>>>        Oh, it's not impossible.  It's just difficult.  There's
>>>> probably a command-line flag you can set to put the server into
>>>> dev mode and increase the debug level.  Who knows?  Perhaps there
>>>> being nothing in the logs is the clue that's needed -- something
>>>> that should be logged not being there is just as important as
>>>> something being logged with an error.
>>>>
>>>>        The other thought is that server startup only takes a few
>>>> seconds, maybe a couple of megs worth of traffic to get registered
>>>> and grab VAC.  Fire up MS's Netmon or maybe Ethereal and do a
>>>> packet capture and send that off.  Alfred should be able to take
>>>> that, filter on his VAC servers, and see exactly what's going out
>>>> and coming back. I don't know Valve's network infrastructure, but
>>>> chances are it's all a switched network.  Send Alfred a private
>>>> e-mail with your server IP and perhaps a schedule of when you'll
>>>> restart and I bet Alfred will be able to get some logging enabled,
>>>> perhaps mirror a server port
>>>> and do his own packet capture.
>>>>
>>>>        That's how I'd approach it, anyway.  Alfred's a busy guy
>>>> and I don't want to say he can or will do this, but it seems to me
>>>> that this approach gives him something more solid to work with.
>>>>
>>>>                - Dan
>>>>
>>>> * Dan Sorenson      DoD #1066      A.H.M.C. #35
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
>>>> * Vikings?  There ain't no vikings here.  Just us honest farmers.
>>>> *
>>>> * The town was burning, the villagers were dead.  They didn't need
>>>> *
>>>> * those sheep anyway.  That's our story and we're sticking to it.
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
>>>> archives, please visit:
>>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
>>> archives, please visit:
>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>>
>> --
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
>> archives, please visit:
>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives, please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to