--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
lol, someone's been smoking crack.

-------Original Message-------

From: Stuart Stegall
Date: 03/19/06 20:28:11
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows2k Pro Vs Fedora Core 4/5 64

  From just a straight performance comparison (not from a
breakage/support standpoint), then for the hlds games, there is
basically no difference between the two platforms (technically I've
found that disk operations happen faster on the linux hlds, but really
it makes no difference except like 1 second on REALLY big maps)

Now for srcds it does seems as though there's a very measurable
performance diffference between the two platforms, with the Windows
server outperforming the Linux server on the same hardware with
basically the same tweaks (mainly the timer tweaks that apply to both
platforms).  My platform hardware is Dell 2800 Xeon P4 2.8 or Aberdeen
Stonehaven A141s with Opteron 248s, 252s, or 254s all running either
Win2k3R2 or Gentoo Linux (2.6.15.1 with some patches related to latency.)

kyle wrote:
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> I run a P4 3.0 gig with one gig of ram, running fedoracore 4 and i have
> never run a more stable server.  i have run strictly win2k in the past and
> now that i have run the linux distro ill never go back to win2k
>
> currently running two dod 1.3 servers at 1X32 slot with amxmodx/metamod
and
> 1X13 slot private match server with no addons.  im also running 1x20 slot
> HLTV server.
> the cpu stays well below 70% when the 32 slot server is full.    this
server
> is also Boosted.
>
> The hit reg on a win2k server with Tick set at 100 is not as good as the
> fedora with that same 100 tick.     the only way to achieve the same hit
reg
> with a win2k box is to tweak the quantums in the registry.      Be careful
> doing this if your not sure what your doing.
> Here is a link to a tutorial for tweaking the win OS quantums
> http://www.ethugsrus.net/home/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=199
> -------Original Message-------
>
> From: Neil Cumming
> Date: 03/19/06 10:52:48
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [hlds] Windows2k Pro Vs Fedora Core 4/5 64
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> I realise this is Windows list, but im just wondering if any admins have
any
> performance comparisions between Windows 2k pro and Fedora Core 4/5 64bit,
> running with an AMD64 Athlon chip for both HLDS and SRCDS. I have a box
with
> the following specs:
>
> Windows 2000 Pro.
> AMD64 Athlon 3400+ (Socket 754)
> 1GB RAM.
>
> I run a few servers on the box, but wondering if I would get more
> performance and stability if i switched to a linux 64bit OS. I cant afford
a
> 64bit Windows OS unfortunatly. Any thoughts appreciated :)
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.5/284 - Release Date: 17/03/2006
>
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
> --
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

--



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to