In response to message below... That benchmark is rubbish. AMXX has focussed on making the scripts run faster. Yet they do not mention the increased CPU overhead that means that AMXX is heavier on the CPU than AMX. AMXX has a history of highlighting all the good points without mentioning the bad. Since it was launched, AMXX has said how much better than AMX it was yet this benchmark shows that it was indeed slower than AMX (in addition to being heavier on cpu).
AMX may not have the activity of AMXX but doesn't need it. Plus AMX 2005 is lighter on CPU than AMXX --__--__-- Message: 4 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:58:31 -0500 From: Hell Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [hlds] Issues with Bots. Reply-To: [email protected] Seriously though why are you still using AMX? The project is practically dead. AMXX runs so much faster and the help and support for it FAR surpasses AMX. Check this out: http://www.amxmodx.org/bench/ Pretty crazy. Its pretty easy to port AMX scripts to AMXX too if you cant find something like you already had. _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
