-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] On 11/17/06, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > As you've seen noted on these lists before. Valve shouldn't have to hold > the hand of the 3rd party plugin creators if they are unwilling to create > plugins that integrate into the provided API from Valve.
How the hell can they cater for an option that never even existed until today? In fact AFAIK, nobody even knew this update was coming, let alone what was going to be in it!! In any case it still breaks plugins that do properly intergrate with the API, or even if it doesn't, what is your argument if NO plugin can function the way the program creator intended if there is nobody using the Valve provided API? That is to say, what the hell is the point of the Valve API if nobody bloody well wants to use it, if it is devoid of functionality and doesn't cater for anything useful. There must be some reason all these plugin creators seem to go out of thei way to NOT USE the Valve API? Maybe the Valve API is about as useful as tit on a bull, which only serves to explain why people go out of their way to program around it. Again, also entirely possible the crew working on DWP has nothing to do with > bug fixes. So really, that shouldn't even be brought into this > discussion. Sorry, you must be confusing Valve with a company that has thousands of employees. They don't. On 11/16/06, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > This is really just a fucken joke > > > > Lets not fix the 1001 bugs that have been thoroughly documented a > millions > > and one times, no, lets fuck with the pricing so the community gets more > > splitered, and lets set the default value of our new update to enabled, > so > > it breaks all the plugins that server operators wouldn't have had to > have > > fucken install in the first place if Valve paid attention and addressed > > all > > the issues we have been raising for years! > > > > On 11/17/06, Scott Pettit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I can join servers okay now that I've disabled CVARX (we were only > > forcing > > > a > > > minimum rate, cmdrate, updaterate, interp - what's the harm?). > > > > > > CVARX ended up creating 200 bans in error which I'm now sitting > > removing. > > > > > > A heads up would have been nice, as would some consultation prior to > > > inflicting such silly changes on those who have to deal with > complaints > > > about people rating. > > > > > > I can accept some clients might not want their settings fucked around > > with > > > - > > > but at least make the default 0, and if clients choose not to have > their > > > settings messed with, I'd rather they played elsewhere instead of my > > > servers. Now we're going to have to dish out bans to raters, rather > than > > > just forcing their rates. > > > > > > -Scott > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whisper > > > Sent: Friday, 17 November 2006 12:41 p.m. > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [hlds] Re: [hlds_announce] Counter-Strike: Source and > > Source > > > Engine Update Released > > > > > > Yay for unhittable 1 and 5 pingers > > > > > > That surely going to improve the games image and make more people want > > to > > > play the game! > > > > > > Also, yay for people who never seem to be able to get flashbanged, we > > like > > > having them on our server to. Probably explains why hardly anybody > > bothers > > > to buy flashbangs, since they rarely ever seem to work. > > > > > > In any case, it doesn't really matter, since nobody seems to be able > to > > > join > > > our servers after this update. Were the Client side STEAM Content > files > > > for > > > Counter-Strike:Source updated by any chance? > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
