Thanks. Any plans to provide more details about blocked cvars on the site? Looking through binary is pretty boring to be honest.
On 09/01/07, Wim Barelds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] We do plan to add similar functionality in the future (unless VALVe implements sv_pure before that time). On 1/9/07, Roman Hatsiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Putting aside your funny needles about competence of those who do not > agree with your opinion, I wonder if zBlock perform files consitency > check the way cvarblock does? If not, any plans to implement this in > the future? > > On 09/01/07, Wim Barelds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > Not at all irony, people who don't want to have clientcommands executed > on > > them don't need to. People who wish to use their servers as forwarders > can > > use that exact same option. I'm not asking VALVe or anyone to give me > access > > to the clientcommands without the use of cl_restrict_server_commands 0. > > Unless you mean that the irony is that people who connect to zblock > servers > > can also be redirected; yes I'd love for that to not be true, good thing > > most server admins competent enough to use zBlock are rarely incompetent > > enough to use their servers as forwarders. > > > > On 1/9/07, Roman Hatsiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It kicks players with cl_restrict_server_commands 1. As simple as > > > that. And few weeks ago zblock author argued against server executed > > > connect command right on this list, what an irony... > > > > > > On 09/01/07, Adam Sando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > I just downloaded and installed zBlock v3.0.0 RC3 on our CS:S > server, in > > > > the hopes to replace what was CVAR-X (before the > > > > cl_restrict_server_commands update). > > > > > > > > From all accounts, the new version works quite well and does not > hinder > > > > performance at all. I have yet to personally test it in a 5v5 scrim, > or > > > > when the server is full, however it will be interesting to know how > it > > > > has circumvented the server commands restriction "feature". > > > > > > > > What do you all use to protect your server against exploiting or > > > > malicious users? > > > > Does anyone make use of Mattie's Eventscripts for this at all? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Adam. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, > > > > please visit: > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ___________________________ > > Wim 'TheUnknownFactor' Barelds > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- ___________________________ Wim 'TheUnknownFactor' Barelds [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
