-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Was the server on a 1:1 NAT prior to the new firewall?
Robert Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Just throwing this out there, I don't know if this will affect anything but what do you have sv_region set to. I'm wondering if the different values of this cvar allocates more or less time the SMSL gives to ping the server to gain a response rather than throwing it out as if it is non-responsive. Such as sv_region 4 (Asia) gets more time to respond to the SMSL before being thrown out a non-responsive compared to sv_region 0 (US East Coast) because of location ect. Does this make any sense? This is just me theorizing, I have no idea if this will work. ----------------------------------------------------- Not sure what sort of time frame the SMSL is expecting. I think the firewall is fast enough to allow any responses through in a timely fashion otherwise the players would be experiencing increased latencies which they are not. What I want to know is why would the SMSL not add these servers to the list if they can communicate with it and they are visible to the rest of the world? Mike ParaDOX www.paradisesgarage.com -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
