When you say that, do you mean "I have direct evidence of a non-malicious server being delisted" or do you mean "by taking what we know of the scoring system and the cutoffs, and making assumptions about the hard figures behind the process, I believe this can happen"?
Because it it's number 2, can I venture to suggest that the amount _not_ known about the system makes that a bad assumption? > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:hlds- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Edwards > Sent: 17 March 2009 00:43 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [hlds] hlds Digest, Vol 13, Issue 133 > > Malicious servers getting delisted = good thing. Agreed. Except it is > possible for servers to get delisted without being malicious > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:04:24 -0400 > > From: "Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald" <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Delisting Information > > To: "'Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list'" > > <[email protected]> > > Message-ID: <001c01c9a68b$8db53da0$a91fb8...@com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > > > It'll probably be impossible for any server to get delisted unless > they > > are > > being malicious. Malicious servers getting delisted = good thing. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
