--
On June 04, 2002, Eric (Deacon) sent me the following:
> Heh, that's always funny.  "You're a puss if you don't ignore the best
> interests of your business, and instead pour an incredible amount of man
> hours into a big hole in the ground: a 4 year old (plus?) engine
> designed from the start to run on Windows being rewritten to function on
> a server OS that a tiny handful of people have adapted for use as a
> desktop OS."  Stan, it's just not practical.  I don't know where you get
> off insinuating that Valve has neither "vision" nor "guts".  That makes
> me mad, man.  You want to kick their dog while you're here?  Working
> personally with the WineX people is already way beyond the call of duty,
> and I'm surprised at your attitude.  Overall, Valve has done--and
> continues to do--a kickass job in a harsh market.  Don't be getting down
> on them because they care more about feeding their families than making
> a handful of die-hard linux freaks happy...

Let's not forget that the only company to actively port games to Linux
went under. I just don't think there's a market for selling games to a
tiny fraction of the population who is used to getting everything for
free.

Linux has been traditionally associated with hackers, and hackers with
pirates, which doesn't help matters any.

--
Chip Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>           http://www.chocobo.cx/chip/
GCM/CS d+(-) s+:++ a20>? C++ UB++++$ P+++$ L- E--- W++ N@ o K- w O M+
V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t+@ R@ tv@ b++@ DI++++ D+(-) G++ e>++ h>++ r++ y?
--
[ Content of type application/pgp-signature deleted ]
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to