Ok, i thought i wouldnt reply to this thread...
but how hard isnt it to do a regexp substitute? 's/\ (at)\ /\@/' bash-2.03$ echo "foo (at) bar.com" | sed 's/\ (at)\ /\@/' [EMAIL PROTECTED] bash-2.03$ the best way is to exclude everything but the name in the email... /kama "Before you criticize a man, you should walk a mile in his shoes. That way, you are a mile away from him. And you've got his shoes." On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Simon Garner wrote: > From: "HoundDawg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > HoundDawg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Behalf of HoundDawg < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > It's currently like this: > > > > HoundDawg < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Which can easily be grabbed and submitted to spam sites...and has for > which > > I have many filter rules to have these auto deleted. =\ The only problem > is > > that it will be more difficult for people to take things off the list as > > they won't have the private email address anymore. > > > > I think not having the real sender's address would be a pain for the reason > you have stated. > > Really the fault lies with mail-archive.com -- any decent list->web archive > site should be mangling all email addresses (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> bar (at) > foo.com), but they are not. I suggest disallowing them from archiving this > list until they can fix their software. > > -Simon > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
