i've tested it... pingboost 1 was best ping in lan with 9-11 ms pingboost 3 is as if u have'nt done anything with pingboost... but im not sure if its right...
cu klaus ps: im sorry about my bad english ;) -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Khyron Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Juni 2002 05:25 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [hlds_linux] pingboost information I'm sure someone will tell me I'm wrong, but the way I see it, as the number increases, the pingboost gets more aggressive. I believe it's to do with sleeps during cycles (thus giving cpu to the other processes). The higher the number the less/shorter the sleeps are. So pingboost 1 will give quicker response to clients at a minor cpu usage cost, whereas pingboost 3 will be quite happy gobbling up 90% of an Athlon XP 1800. You have to test on your server to see whats best (probably not 3 unless you a rich fool. :) Khyron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew A. Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:09 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] pingboost information > Hello- > I've been looking through the archives trying to find the explanation of > pingboost 1, 2, and 3 without much luck. Could someone point out the > explanation of it, or give an explanation of the differences between the 3 > methods? Thanks. > > -a > > --- > Andrew A. Chen > Divo Networks > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
