www.todaysclan.com sells 20 player public servers for $100.00

you should talk to them... #todaysclan on gamesnet

Cheers

Prodigy

On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:28:12 -0700
"jeev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Yea man, I wish I could get some speakeasy shit here that things quick
> as hell heh.
>
> j
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edge100x
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 8:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Good Colocation Sites
>
> I've had experience with using Speakeasy to host servers, with the 768
> SDSL
> and 1.5 SDSL packages. It worked flawlessly and was very fast.
>
> Speakeasy uses InterNAP too ;)
>
> Edge100x
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 4:36 AM
> Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Good Colocation Sites
>
>
> > Hey guys, while we're on the performance provider issue, I'd like to
> ask
> you
> > all about Speakeasy's DSL packages.  I'm currently on SW Bell DSL here
> at
> > home, and would like to have a few more slots in my private CS server.
> I
> > currently give $59/month for 1.5Mb/s down and 128Kb/s up with 5 static
> IPs.
> > SW Bell wants $179/month for 384Kb/s outbound (their max upload rate
> for
> > ADSL in St. Louis, period), with the same 1.5Mb/s down.  That's
> outrageous!
> >
> > Speakeasy offers "classic" ADSL at 1.5Mb/s down, and 768Kb/s up for
> $99
> with
> > 2 static IPs.  Have any of you had any experiece with Speakeasy
> (besides
> the
> > HLDS auth stuff), and specifically with this package, or a similar
> one?
> >
> > If any of you have had experience with Speakeasy ADSL, and hosting
> game
> > servers on it, or know someone who has, please tell me all you can,
> good
> and
> > bad.
> >
> > Thx a bunch.
> >
> > StanTheMan
> > TheHardwareFreak
> > http://www.hardwarefreak.com
> > rcon admin at:
> > Beer for Breakfast servers        <http://bfb.bogleg.org/>
> >    209.41.98.2:27016 (CS multi-map)   209.41.98.2:27015 (DoD)
> >    209.41.98.2:27017 (CS militia/dust2)            Dallas, TX
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: jeev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 8:47 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Good Colocation Sites
> > >
> > >
> > > Hahah me too, I get like maybe 40ms ping on cogent and on savvis I
> get
> > > 15 ms ping and im only like 12 miles from the lines :< over
> > > here sbc is
> > > great.
> > >
> > > j
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Edge100x
> > > Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 6:37 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Good Colocation Sites
> > >
> > > As jeev said, it relates to bad peering. Few places want to peer for
> > > free
> > > with Cogent because it tends to mainly dump things onto their
> network
> > > and
> > > not use much traffic the other way. Cogent needs to keep costs down
> to
> > > support its low prices, so it chooses very few peers and keeps
> traffic
> > > on
> > > its network for as long as it can before offloading it. This
> > > means that
> > > packets on the Cogent network frequently get routed around the
> country
> > > before reaching their destination.
> > >
> > > I've run many, many traceroutes while I've had my Cogent
> > > bandwidth, and
> > > it
> > > pings badly to just about anyone from Seattle. The few exceptions
> > > generally
> > > relate to those people who get routed quickly onto mfnx.net here
> (such
> > > as
> > > some people on pacbell and using AT&T cable).
> > >
> > > It's pretty amusing to get 100 ping to my Cogent server 10
> > > minutes away,
> > > when my provider peers with Sprint, AT&T, WorldCom, Verio, and
> Level3.
> > >
> > > Edge100x
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 6:17 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Good Colocation Sites
> > >
> > >
> > > > > I meant worthless for my purposes. I.e., servers.
> > > >
> > > > OK, what I'm asking is how/why is it worthless for HL servers?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Eric (the Deacon remix)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the
> > > list archives,
> > > please visit:
> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> > > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > archives, please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>


--
James Couzens
Network Manager,
Market News Publishing

(604) 689-1101 TEL
(604) 689-1106 FAX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to