"James Gurney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... <SNIP> > Ok, running I might have been exagerating, but frequently you'll watch > people hiding behind a wall.. They sidestep out with their awp zoomed, > and are able to fire and get an accurate shot without pausing to steady > the weapon, crouching, etc. My entire point was that the awp is lacking > any sort of random movement such as you would expect in a realistic > sniper rifle. > This is a talent learned. You sidestep and press the other way. If you fire at the right time you get a true 100% accurate shot but this is hard to do and takes lots of practice and skill. I am learning, slowly.
<SNIP> > > This was remedied before, and apparently someone has figured a way > around it again because it's something I see fairly often. > I have seen this in the last couple weeks too and while it sucks, its no reason to attack the weapon itself. A hack is just as deadly and maddening on any other weapon. > > Yes, this was my point. It's not realistic, and while I agree that > nothing in CS is, I personally think the awp is disproportionately > unrealistic compared to other weapons. > so was the rail gun in Q3 an unfair weapon as well? There will always be the TOP, most powerful weapon. Taking that away, takes away the reward of the good player. My reward for killing 5 peopel in the pistol round is that I get to buy an awp the next round and actually have some fun. > > You have a habit of making posts which contain comments that make > judgements on other people (see quoted email pieces above). If you're > not going to make points on the question at hand, I consider that to be > trolling. come one james, you know eric and how he gets. Eric can be an ass but its all in good fun and he usually has a good point. > > James > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
