> No, I see the many blatant weakness of your counter arguments. > > UMP is CHEAPER then the mp5, so mp5 SHOULD be better > Deagle costs MORE then a Glock, so Deagle SHOULD be better
Heh...blatant weakness of his arguments?? Can I get the name of your dealer?? :D MP5 is cheaper, ROF is higher, and mag capacity is 30 vs 25 for UMP. Overall usefulness is much higher for the MP5 than the UMP. Nobody's yet figured out why exactly the UMP is in the game. Me, I just want my b6 MP5 back :\ > But 4-7 and 4-8 cost MORE then an AWP... why is AWP much much better? It's not that AWP is "better" so much as the auto-rifles "suck ass". Nobody has yet figured out why Valve has left them as they are instead of either making them useful or simply taking them out of the game. > In the assaultrifels section is basicly just the AK that is way of (sic) > relative the others. Yep. Leave AUG price pretty much alone while dropping colt price to match the AK. At least at the lower price you'll encourage more aggressive gameplay (due to getting better weapons at a slightly lower price) while hopefully matching the ugliness that occurs when both the CT's and T's economies are tied around $3000. -- Eric (the Deacon remix) _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
