HLG getting vey accurate on its detections? Err no, It became exceedingly difficult around that point and it was almost becoming worthless. Cheater makers found ways to hide thier files and store them in directories other than the HL directory.
Cheers -Asylum-Skitzo HLGuard Support team ----- Original Message ----- From: "Delirium Tremens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 7:01 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC Security Modules -Beta Password Changed > You tell me... It's no secret that Valve turned down PB's offer to > implement their cheat protection into the code for the nominal sum of > "One Dollar". > > It's also no secret that the "security hole" has been in the HL Code for > years, and no one has *ever* decided to remove it.. UNTIL: > HLG starts to getsvery, very accurate on it's detections. Right before > the 1109 patch was released HLGaurd was having a VERY succesful run at > being 100% positive in it's file/cvar scanning. When it was running on > my server, I was getting ZERO false positives.. NONE. > Then Valve says "hey... we are releasing this version with VAC, you want > me to go in and fix the code to disable the exec'ing of files?" (Which I > have no idea if it truly transpired like that, but I'd bet you that I'm > VERY close... > > Like I stated earlier, I'm -NOT- flaming Valve at all. And I'm not > flaming them that TFC is and has been waiting patiently on bug fixes and > VAC for quite some time. > > I'm just stating that VALVe would have been a better friend to the > CS/TFC/DoD community IF they would have left the scanning in at least > until > their VAC was complete... > > Doesn't that simply make better sense? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:hlds_linux-admin@;list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Tyler > "Overkill" Schwend > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 9:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC Security Modules -Beta Password Changed > > "Cornering" a market? On anti-cheats? My economics might be a > little screwed, but what financial advantage would valve have in > purposely breaking HLGuard? > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
