> > A router (by my reckoning, anyway) would be any device that routes > > packets between networks. A NAT device does this; a switch does not. > > I think thats correct, be it $100 or $38,000 not including > operating system (thanks Cisco) if it moves packets from IP > network to another, its a router. No need for router racism.
Negative. RFC1918 addresses are also classed as 'non routable' addresses. The packets DO NOT get routed, they get translated, there's a difference between the 2, but most people buy into the marketing hoopla and don't wish to see that. -- Eric (the Deacon remix) _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
