This is what we are saying... Kernel versions after 2.4.9 are wierd... Try the one we suggested and find out this yourself, no idea in us speculation any more before you've tried that...
/Oscar
Michael Madsen wrote:
I'm at this moment running two servers.
1. Runnning de_dust 16/16 = <1% cpu usage 2. Running cs_estate 13/15 = 40% cpu 3. Running de_aztec 10/12 = <1% cpu
Then the players on #3 is dropping out and the CPU usage for #2 is <1% again.
It's really freaking me out, because I don't know what to look for. Could it be NIC-drivers which causes this, because it can't keep up with the packets? I'm using eepro100.c:v1.26 11/17/2002 drivers with my 82557/8/9? Or is it really the kernel which is screwing it up?
Michael *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 25-03-2003 at 16:19 Michael Madsen wrote:
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 25-03-2003 at 09:50 Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
I would imagine it has to do w/ overhead due to changes/improvements tothe
kernel. I think around 2.4.9 they redid the VM and continued tweaking it afterwards?
So you think I'd be better of with the 2.4.9 or have they fixed something after 2.4.17, so my 2.4.20 is alright?
Michael
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
