well.. my server got a lower load when enabling hz=1000.. not much but still lower.. hmm.. perhaps 1-2% lower...
/Bjorn On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Oscar N aka Dreadful wrote: > lower??? are you sure? our servers used slightly more CPU with > HZ=1000, not that much but still not lower :) > > /Oscar, www.bhood.nu > > On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 02:26:25 +0200 (CEST) > kama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Bart wrote: > > > > > I've just installed FreeBSD 5.0 on a SMP-system, > > > and I'm running several CS-servers on it. > > > > > > My question is: > > > > > > Does the HZ=1000 (or another HZ-option above 100) increase or > > > decrease the CPU-usage. The kernel is now compiled with > > > the standard HZ. The problems isn't the latency (that's low enough), > > > but the question is: what happens according to the CPU-usage? > > > > It will lower the cpu usage slightly.. but the main benefit is that you > > can run the server higher than 50fps.. > > > > btw, the hz value is changable through sysctl under FBSD 5.0... > > > > /Bjorn > > > > -- > > Favourite Comment: > > Programming is an art form that fights back. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > > visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ...things make for a much more comfortable system. They should also reduce downtime, not that many FreeBSD admins know what downtime is. _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
