This e-mail is a digest.
> Following the correct developers protocol, Beta = UNSTABLE, in
> development, not ready for public use.
> Some of us don't update to beta's and wait for the public release.
>
Such as 3.1.1.1.?
"was just bringing this topic into the light again because I had
obviously shown that I had taken major steps to contact Valve, only
being short of ringing their office."
I don't know the long distance rates in NZ, but you can ring up the
offices... You can even call some of the employees at home and bug them,
if you think you are being ignored.
> It was a general summary, if you coudlnt tell from all the past
issues,
> it was to bring the topic into the spot light.
>
What topic? I still don't understand what a hitbox conspiracy is :\
> Hell, if you managed to read the whole thing, Im quite certain every
> other person wont have a problem :)
No need to insult my intelligence, you're the one being a donkey-hole
here...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jeremy wrote:
"Now I bet youd be the first one here crying if you got banned for
something that wasnt your fault."
I'd like to be the booky on that bet, would make lotsa money. I don't go
crying, as you put it, in public lists about a problem I have. You
didn't see me talking here when my viewdemo function dissapeared, when I
couldn't run HLTV on my comp, when my half-life refused to work after
installing a server patch over my client, etc. etc.
all of those fixed btw, dont be afraid.
"Point to note too, this isnt just drew saying "I personally cannot play
CS for a week" this is his Job, his employer loosing money. They either
have to go upgrade a perfectly good PC, or pay for new copies of CS.
This is simply not acceptable."
I wouldn't call a computer with corrupt memory chips a "prefectly good
PC"
--
MoD.
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
