->-----Original Message----- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of EnemySpy ->Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:42 PM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Various Issues of beta 1.6 the game. -> -> -> ->----- Original Message ----- ->From: "m0gely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:33 PM ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Various Issues of beta 1.6 the game. -> -> ->> It's been said before recently that people are giving Valve ->crap for not fixing ->> stuff, then when they do, they get crap for that too. This is ->Valve's beta ->> test, not ours. When stuff brakes, it's expected. If a plugin ->brakes, then ->> it's the plugin's authors responsibility to fix it. If you ->were warned ahead of ->> time would you not test it out? How does that help Valve? ->When Valve rolls out ->> a patch you don't have a choice anyway the steam clients are ->updated too. -> ->Er, its not just betas they screw up on. They have managed to ->screw something up on lots (if not all) of their final releases. ->And as for fixing things, they always appear to break something else. -> ->I enjoy CS, and I host 2 servers, but I think the support sucks. -> ->This auto update worries me too (and yes, I know you can turn it ->off). But I can see servers auto downloading the latest update ->and crashing because valve forgot to check something before they ->released the update. ->
how can you say that? you act as if any other game company has done as much over such a long time for any of their games, not charging a dime more to the players who bought the original game.... ummmm. no one? also, whats the point of turning off auto update, when clients cant, and will therefor not be able to continue playing on your servers? kev _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
