interesting, the Athlon 2500+ is a barton core processor running not significantly faster (mhz) than a 2200+ but bringing other advantages such as 512kb of L2 vs 256 and 333mhz FSB vs 266. I'm running a 2800+ barton core as my NS server and have seen some surprisingly good cpu utilisation from a known cpu pig
wonder if there's something more to it or just that the barton athlon is the potential hlds cpu of choice. Matt D >On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Alfred Reynolds wrote: > >> It appears that the performance problem is predominantly on INTEL CPUs (I >> have reports of AMD cpus running at 1/3rd the CPU usage of the i686 build). > >I can believe that. > >http://bs-linux.com/hlds_stats/ <- daily and weekly graphical reports from >an AMD 2500+ hosting two 14 max tfc servers. Just to add to your figures. > > >_______________________________________________ >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
