pure bullshit that the updated cbble/aztec/inferno takes so insane much more
cpu than
the older versions, it's really killing cs.

- Sindre

>===== Original Message From Arie M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =====
>Commendatore wrote:
>
>>Hie all ;-)
>>
>>Is someone know why some maps have more cpu load than others ?
>>
>>I've 5 Steam CS servers on a P4 2,4GHz machine under Debian stable, and when
>>the maps are aztec or italy, each map have between 20% and 70% cpu load on
>>only one server with 18 slots max. On others maps, i've a cpu load between
>>0% and 17% max...
>>
>>So is it raisonnable to have developed maps that requires half cpu load for
>>a 18 slots server ?
>>Is Steam plan to update aztec and italy ?
>>
>>BigGun.
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
>>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>
>>
>>
>>
>It's not really the maps....it's the players walking and shooting on
>those maps.
>
>Some maps are more hectic than others. Requiring more CPU time.
>
>_______________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to