On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:01:40PM -0500, David Lee wrote: > [...] I've tried various optimizations and different > options for the compile and config. This includes the low latency stuff, > which produced the worst performance of all.
The low latency patch make cpu usage higher (by hlds), but hlds performances are _really_ better with it (better pings). This patch doesn't execute "cpu tasks" faster, but allow the kernel to check more often if there is something to do. So, "cpu tasks" dont wait too long before being executed, that's why the cpu usage is higher, and the hlds run smoother. -- DjoDjo _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
