My server sits in my home office, has a monitor that is connected and on
24/7, and I would NEVER run a screen saver on it. If I'm going to bed or
going to be gone, I either turn it off, or just turn the contrast down.
Screen savers are evil! Evil, I tell you! And they also brand you as NEWB.
Screen savers...just say no....


----- Original Message -----
From: "Donald Holl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] OS opinions please


> Right, but maybe his server is at home or does have a monitor connected.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 08:20 PM
> Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] OS opinions please
>
>
> > Ummmm why use a screen saver at all? lol. Call me silly but when I see
> > pictures of rack servers in datacenters I dont see monitors hooked up to
> > them all.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Donald Holl
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 7:53 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] OS opinions please
> >
> > It's best to use a screen saver that uses low resources especially on a
> > server machine. I recommend a screen saver with a static image such as
> > Blank; it uses hardly any CPU versus the OpenGL 3DPipes screen saver.
Those
> > OpenGL screen savers were meant to use as much CPU as they can to show
off
> > the "power" of your computer. It is really not a good idea to use
> > hem.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Mike Donahue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 10:37:57 -0700
> >
> > Well that's the kind of useful
> > feedback I've been looking for!
> > For the rest of the responders, thanks.  I
> > was worried that my 3DPipes
> > screensaver would kill my single instance
> > server, and it doesn't look like
> > it will. :) > > My intent was not to turn
> > this into a *nix/MS war (btw awps suck!), as each > has its place; for
me,
> > it looks like 2k3 is the better solution.
> >
> > Thanks again for the feedback.
> > FWIW, I'll take performance snapshots of the
> > server now under full load,
> > do the same when it's 2k3, and post the results.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > P.S. I don't
> > think you can run fsck on windows!
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to