Sindre wrote: >although not optimal, it works just fine for most small scale purposes. > >- Sindre > >>===== Original Message From Jason Arden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ===== >>LOL this guy made his Linux installation one big partition... good game. >> >>-Jason >> >>ruwen wrote: >> >>>William H. \ Du Chene wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>You could simply put the server on FreeBSD. >>>> >>>>If you were to install FreeBSD 5.2 and the linux binary compatibility >>>>layer, >>>>you may well find that ( on the very same hardware ) the linux server >will >>>>run faster and your users do not exprience nearly as much lag than on >even >>>>a >>>>linux installation. Additionally, FreeBSD is very stable, consumes far >>>> >>>> >>>less >>> >>> >>>>space than a comperable RedHat installation and - IMHO - far easier to >>>> >>>> >>>work >>> >>> >>>>with. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>I am interesting in less disk space because I have only small HDDs. >>> >>>csserver1:/home/ruwen# df -h >>>Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >>>/dev/sda1 667M 469M 197M 71% / >>> >>>Does FreeBSD use less diskspace? >>> >>>greetings ruwen >>>
One BIG partition? I don't think so :) But making partitions for such a small HDD isn't usefull imho because u need every MB :) greetings ruwen _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
