We use a Cisco PIX where we colo our boxes that have several ips bound to it. Once the firewall was in place, we did a static nat translation from the global address to a local address and bound the subsequent local address to the machine.
Since only a local ip is bound, thats what we use for HLDS. We allow all traffic out, but had to open 27015 to obviously allow traffic in. Other than, worked like a charm. Patrick Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > -- > Hi, I have 6 boxes all running CS / CZ servers. I have about 30 Servers all > together (Maybe a little More maybe a little less). My boxes are Co-Located > in london with 100mbps pipe (10mbit allocated to me).I am thinking of putting > the whole lot behind a firewall to help secure the boxes and make the whole > lot more managable. > > If i put the IP Addresses on the firewall and have the boxes Nat'ed behind it > on address space like 192.168.1.5-12/255.255.255.0 Will they still show up in > the steam server list? > > When starting the server do i set the -IP flag to the 192.168.1.* address or > the External interface of the Firewall? (I would imagine the external ip), ie > 217.159.753.X > > Has anyone else done anything like this and experienced any problems doing > so? > > Thanks for your help > > Richy > -- > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
