1000hz is over kill for hlds. As I recall on the game servers we used to run, we found out that 512 hz performed just as well as 1000hz but you didn't see the high cpu usage associated with the overhead of using 1000hz.
Just for a side note. 1000hz will produce a substanial overhead compared to 100hz. Matt On Saturday 21 August 2004 3:01 pm, Chris Adams wrote: > Surely 1000Hz on an XP 1700+ is overkill? Especially when you're only using > a ticrate of 200 it seems a bit pointless.. Maybe lower the Hz to 512 or > something? > > Chris Adams > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Arató Ádám" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 9:17 PM > Subject: [hlds_linux] CPU useage > > > Hi guys > > > > I have a little problem now. > > My box is an amd athlon xp 1700+, 1024 MB DDR, Asus a7v333, debian linux > > with 2.4.26 kernel. > > Today i recompiled the kernel with 1000 HZ, then i set the sys_ticrate > > value > > > to 200. > > HLDS (cs 1.6) is running, but its CPU usage with 2 players is 99,9%. > > Disabled pingboost and logging, but seems to do nothing. > > > > CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players > > 99.90 28.98 44.41 62 36 100.09 2 > > > > Over 10 players the ping going up to 100-120 ms. > > I'm using the amd optimised binary. > > Server plugins: metamod 1.17.1, adminmod 2.50.59, clanmod 1.82.b1 > > Anybody can help? > > > > a. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
