My main concern is the readability of the output. First of all I don't
really feel like scrolling for ages when I type status and also does it
take longer to read 4-5 lines per user rather than 1 per client.

Philip

Morten Aarøe wrote:

Yep, I must agree on the status thing, if for a different reason also. I
did my own realtime stats and admin server frontend for hlds. It works
by parsing the log output realtime using the logaddress and a java
server application and it uses rcon status to keep track of the users on
the server (well, actually it just uses it to correct for the fact that
packets containing connects/disconnects might be lost and also it seems
that hlds sometimes forgets to write some disconnect events in the log -
is this a bug other people have noticed or am I just not parsing the log
well enough?). I haven't been able to get srcds running on my Debian
stable servers so I haven't tested it, but I have heard rumors (on this
list as far as I remember) that the new rcon status command doesn't
include the user SteamID. This seems very impractical for many different
reasons. In my own case it's annoying because my whole system is based
on a unique player ID derived from the SteamID. In this way I can avoid
people cheating on their stats by just changing their name etc.

So please, please don’t change the rcon status output info without good
reason to do so. I can understand why you might want to restrict normal
user access to SteamIDs (as earlier with IPs) but server admins can
always find this information in the logs anyway, right? The layout is
not really a big concern as I have no problem with adapting my parser to
a different format if necessary, but the info should not be limited in
the rcon status.

I am a big fan of the old saying "Don't fix it if it ain't broke" - and
I don’t see anything broken here. If you have good reason to change it
there really isn't a lot for us to do about it, but please tell us why.

I'm not trying flame you guys at valve, as I think you do a good job
trying to improve everyone's experience with hlds/srcds - especially on
this mailing list. Hope you will note my input and take it as
constructive feedback in stead of just ranting...

Regards,
Morten Aarøe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to