FDC is crap.

check out webhostingtalk.com and use the search feature.

Also - Cogent is crap for game servers. Cogent is the dollar store of
bandwidth providers. High latency. Its good for website hosting and thats
about it. If you want good colo try dedicatednow.com or if you just want a
server 15minuteservers.com has some good deals. There are other quality
providers as well. Oh and stay away from Ezzi.net as well. I lost ALL of my
NY customers within 2 months of moving to there. Sucked.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Edge100x
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 5:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Colocation Question


It doesn't look like they actually use any Level3 right now, at least on the
inbound.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# traceroute www.fdcservers.net
traceroute to fdcservers.net (66.90.66.135) from 64.94.100.102, 30 hops max,
38 byte packets
 1  3-0.router.la.losangeles.nuclearfallout.net (64.94.101.254)  0.303 ms
0.435 ms  0.171 ms
 2  ge-3-1-542.ipcolo2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.78.194.49)  0.447 ms  0.667
ms  0.432 ms
 3  4.68.113.161 (4.68.113.161)  0.536 ms  0.668 ms  0.679 ms
 4  4.68.128.157 (4.68.128.157)  12.345 ms ge-0-1-0.bbr1.SanJose1.Level3.net
(64.159.1.129)  12.259 ms 4.68.128.157 (4.68.128.157)  12.078 ms
 5  so-6-0-0.edge2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.68.121.194)  12.545 ms  12.636 ms
so-7-0-0.edge2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.68.121.198)  12.620 ms
 6  cogent-level3-oc48.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.68.127.202)  12.572 ms
cogent-level3-oc48.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.68.127.18)  12.626 ms  12.711 ms
 7  p6-3.core01.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.233)  13.303 ms  13.284
ms
13.230 ms
 8  p4-0.core01.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.93)  13.220 ms  13.134 ms
13.047 ms
 9  p14-0.core01.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.186)  58.747 ms  58.800
ms
59.047 ms
10  p15-0.core02.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.62)  58.782 ms  58.780 ms
58.893 ms
11  FDC_Servers.demarc.cogentco.com (38.112.0.234)  65.012 ms  64.684 ms
64.475 ms
12  * * *
13  * * *

And I can only wonder why they're heavily prepending it.

router> sh ip bg 66.90.66.135
BGP routing table entry for 66.90.64.0/20
Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
  Not advertised to any peer
  3356 174 30058 30058 30058 30058 30058 30058
    x.x.x.x from x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 90, valid, external
      Last update: Fri Dec 10 20:43:44 2004

 (other bgp entry removed)
router>

If you want to put up a cheap webserver, you might consider that place. But
not if you want to put up game servers.

John

----- Original Message -----
From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Colocation Question


> Looking at that page for FDC, be careful.  I see two providers, Level 3
and
> Cogent.  Level 3 is good, but if you do a lot of traffic across Cogent for
a
> game server you're going to have headaches.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nathan Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 2:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Colocation Question
>
>
>> By the way, I asked this question originally awhile ago, and want to
>> finally
>> give my final finding.  If anyone wants cheap colocation, and wants to
>> host
>> a lot of CS servers, (and even webservers once you see what I'm talkin
>> about), look at http://www.fdcservers.net/colocation.html .  100 Mbit
>> burstable, and if you look at Axia's graph,
>> http://www.axia.org.uk/server-graphs.php, that is incredible.  The only
>> thing to worry about is the computing power!  But, there is a small
catch,
>> if you look into their forums it appears that occasionally they don't
have
>> the best support, but if your looking at colo u know what your doing ;)
>> UNMETERED at these prices is the shizer!  That puts one answer to the
>> colocation question, finally.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux





_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to