and i guess you have your config settings for maxrate, maxupdaterate,
minrate, and minupdaterate all set to default.

I can run a lot of servers on dual xeons by properly tuning the configs.
Oh, one more thing, this is running Windows 2000 server.

Tom wrote:

Go with the Opterons!
I ran 4 24 player CS server on one box.
3 of them downloaded custom maps content from a webserver running on the
same box.
When all 4 server were filled up I messured a overall system load of
around
80% CPU and about 50% 2GB RAM.
Players didn't complain about lag once.
I got dissapointed by Xeons though.

Tom

----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 9:20 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] server cpu preference


I know we have beat this dead horse a thousand times but here it goes
again.
Im not asking if intel is better than amd or vice versa as a cpu company
etc. I just want to know out of the following 2 configurations what
would
give me more performance in a multi cs-server aspect. Anyone running
either
of these 2 configs?

2x 242 CPU (1.6GHz) (1MB cache)
80GB 7200RPM HDD
1GB ECC RAM

or

2x 2.4GHz Hyperthreading
160 GB HDD (2 x 80)
1 GB RAM


-- Dedicated Servers Available East Coast Only - 1200gb BW p4 thru xeon - AIM: gotgameservers



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux





_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux





_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to