Besides the fact it would be pretty stupid to have servers hosted on an OC192 with no limits :). Would be asking for trouble.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Shinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 10:37 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] server cpu preference
It always cracks me up when people claim these "T3 / OC192 / OC3" pipes for there game server company. Yet my single game server machine housing lots of slots barely tops 2mbits at any time. I hope all those people realize the difference between 5mbit capped link and an OC192 most likely wont be noticed in a game server environment. I'm glad you had the balls to say it's a 10mbit uplink. Which is usually the deciding factor =)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In those terms its a MCI OC48 Full Sonnet Ring with the additon of dual OC192's in the upcoming future. Of course the servers are at 10Mbps.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kennycom Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 1:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] server cpu preference
ahh,,, I hadn't thought about it in those terms, normally people say how fat the pipe is not their monthly usage limits... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sebastian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 9:54 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] server cpu preference
i assume he means 1200gb monthly transfer, not how big the pipe is ;)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kennycom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 12:36 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] server cpu preference
You might want to fix your typo.... > East Coast Only - 1200gb BW
Considering an OC-192=9.952Gbps.... Unless I am missing something here...
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 8:20 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] server cpu preference
I know we have beat this dead horse a thousand times but here it goes again. Im not asking if intel is better than amd or vice versa as a cpu company etc. I just want to know out of the following 2 configurations what
would
give me more performance in a multi cs-server aspect. Anyone running either of these 2 configs?
2x 242 CPU (1.6GHz) (1MB cache) 80GB 7200RPM HDD 1GB ECC RAM
or
2x 2.4GHz Hyperthreading 160 GB HDD (2 x 80) 1 GB RAM
-- Dedicated Servers Available East Coast Only - 1200gb BW p4 thru xeon - AIM: gotgameservers
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
