On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Andrew Forsberg wrote:
[snip]
> IMHO, if you're aiming for chance players with a marketing strategy of
> 'grab the lowest first octet IP', then you're grasping at straws
> anyway... If you've gambled all on an undocumented system like that then
> you're as foolish as a h4x0r who thinks the latest OGC is undetectable.
This smacks of some people offering low last octet servers for a premium
and then being bitten in the ass with the client interaction changed, most
amusing.
Like the previous situation the behaviour will probably change, though
it's obviously harder to influence it in this instance (maybe even to the
point where it's a non-issue and hence will be left unmolested)
I have 62. 82. and 195. addresses kicking around, though I must admit I
probably won't be bored enough to test this for quite some time.
J.
--
Jess Kitchen ^ burstfire.net[works] _25492$
| www.burstfire.net.uk
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
