yea, don't play if you don't like it.. you have a choice to play 1.6 or cs source. no one is forcing anyone to play a game they do not like.. if i didn't like it i wouldn't be playing it. quite logical.
sure it has some issues but at least we have game devs like valve who at least support their games for many years, unlike some companies who make a game and 6 months after they don't care about it anymore to update it and start working on another game just to earn $$$ and dump it again after another 6 months, and repeat over and over. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wolfgang Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > but wasnt it the plan to only renew the game's graphics but not change the > gameplay? i thought so. > > the issues in cs 1.6 are rather trivially compared to the issues in css > mentioned here. buggy shield? well, disallow to buy it. flashbugs? disallow > to use them. and so on... > i dont see that easy options to turn off the common problems in css. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Richard Fennell wrote: > > > >> (blah blah blah) > > > > > > CS 1.6 has a ton of problems; comparing CS:S to the original as if the > > original were a perfect game is ridiculous. They both have an amazing > > number of issues. They are also two different games, in case you did > > not notice. > > > > Although you have some good points about the problems CS:S does have, > > you lost all credibility when you began insulting other people's skill > > as players. You have not played them, and it is irrelevent to the > > discussion. In fact, the discussion is irrelevent to this list, which > > is "Linux Dedicated Server". _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
