On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:09:06PM +0200 or thereabouts, Pawel Dziekonski wrote: > On wto, 10 maj 2005 at 10:38:14 -0400, William Warren wrote: > > VAC for 1.6 is not useful for stopping hackers as it has not been > > updated in months. Use hlguard(thezproject.org) or C-D or > > something else..:) > > there is one thing common to regular players and cheaters - all they do > not like C-D servers. it's still better to have VAC than an empty server.
VAC will empty your servers my friends. It's actually better to use these wasted CPU cycles to.. host Ventrilo for example. CS was a great project back when it was free, now community is split between CS 1.5 [yes still played] 1.6, CZ, CS:S. Don't you just love what Valve does with CS? Any sane person would have used PunkBuster by now, but not Valve. I'm sure we will see PB on Q4 pretty soon, almost from day 1. Not like here where in CS:S cheaters are rampant for months. But oh! VAC2? Nothing but empty promises. A year from now CD 5.x will do the trick. _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
