UGH....you know what is bad...I have a gut feeling that they won't be updating VAC2 on a consistent basis and it won't be better than VAC1....
On 7/25/05, RoAcH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >If the VAC2 developers aren't 110% as vigilant as the cheat developers, > >it will fail, no question - cheaters will learn how to jump through any > >order of loops pretty quickly to get their precious aids working, it's > >up to valve to change and tighten those loopholes as the need arises. > > Which is my biggest worry... For the short period that they were really onto > of Vac1 with updating it all the time, it helped tremendously cause cheats > were disabled quickly... If they follow that pattern with Vac2, then I think > it will be alright.. sure, cheats will be out there, but they won't work for > long. > > Now, if Valve just sits back and doesn't update Vac2 on a consistent, > regular basis, then it's going to be no better then Vac1. > > > RoAcH > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- -- Zack Sloane http://zteknology.com We Put Personal Back in Personal Computer! You Dream it, We Build It! _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
