--
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:54:20 +0100
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bubbled:

> Yes, you're right.
>
> We had three processes:
> First process: screen launch
> Second process: shell and srcds_run launch
> Third process: srcds_processorspecific launch
>
> But now we have five processes:
> First process: screen launch
> Second process: shell and srcds_run launch
> Third process: srcds_processorspecific launch
> Fourth process: srcds_processorspecific launch
> Fifth process: srcds_processorspecific launch
>
> As you will see, the processor specific program is started in multiple
> instances ... no threads - real processes.
>
> I'll attach an output of my proc. list ps -elf:
>
> F S UID PID PPID C PRI NI ADDR SZ WCHAN STIME TTY TIME CMD
> 040 S cssuser 12664 1 0 69 0 - 644 select Dec06 ? 00:00:00 SCREEN -mS
> src ./srcds_run -game cstrike ...
> 000 S cssuser 12665 12664 0 69 0 - 563 wait4 Dec06 ttyp3
> 00:00:00 /bin/sh ./srcds_run -game cstrike ...
> 000 S cssuser 16484 12665 34 69 0 - 40706 nanosl Dec06 ttyp3 01:17:47
> ./srcds_amd -game cstrike ...
> 040 S cssuser 16485 16484 0 69 0 - 40706 poll Dec06 ttyp3 00:00:00
> ./srcds_amd -game cstrike ...
> 040 S cssuser 16486 16485 0 69 0 - 40706 nanosl Dec06 ttyp3 00:00:19
> ./srcds_amd -game cstrike ...
>
> Parent PID of second proc. is first proc ... parent PID of third
> proc. is second proc.
>
> Process will launch itself two additional times.
>
> After server quit all processes will die ... no zombies. Restart will
> raise all three instances again ... and this is new ... ;o)
>
> Cheers, Glenn.

What's the problem with 3 processes??
I don't get the point!
--
MyExcuse:
Some one needed the powerstrip, so they pulled the switch plug.

Martin Zwickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Research & Development

TechnoTrend AG <http://www.technotrend.de>
--
[ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ]
--

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to