On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 23:09 -0600, Eric (Deacon) wrote: > In a bold display of creativity, Scott Pettit wrote: > > cmd/update at 101 = 101 updates/s - hence why I can't see a point in having > > 1000fps and so on - all those extra frams would just be dumped.
24 clients client 1: requests snapshots at ticks 27 + 54 + 90 client 2: requests snapshots at ticks 28 + 54 + 80 client 3: requests snapshots at ticks 42 + 88 ... client 24: requests snapshots at ticks 12 + 27 + 48 + 62 + 82 > > What's the point in being able to push so many clock cycles? All those > extra cycles would just be dumped. That's why I stick to low-end > hardware. Three cheers for The Low End Brethren! Lol, you and your bank of acoustic couplers. _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
