- Pentium 4 3 GHz
- 2 GB dual channel DDR RAM
- Kernel 2.6.16.11
- HT enabled including the kernel SMT hyperthreading scheduler support
- The preemption model is set to 'Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency
Desktop)' and 'Preempt The Big Kernel Lock'
- Kernel timer frequency is 1000 Hz
- Linux distribution is Debian 3.1 Sarge
- the libc6-i686 module is installed (NPTL support and optimizations for
i686 CPUs)
- srcds runs with the default tickrate at 250 fps
- the system load average is 0.02
until now i've not noticed any lags but i've seen two error messages on
the server console and a frame rate drop on the server side to about 10
fps when shooting at physic objects. this wasn't the case with the last
srcds version.
the two error messages that i've seen are the following.
on server start:
net.cpp (932) : Assertion Failed: 0 == iRet && iValLen == sizeof( iVal )
&& cSendBufSize <= iVal
net.cpp (940) : Assertion Failed: 0 == iRet && iValLen == sizeof( iVal )
&& cRecvBufSize <= iVal
and while playing on the server:
SteamStartValidatingUserIDTicket: Returned ESteamError 25
Phillip
Alfred Reynolds wrote:
I am interested into the split of single vs. multi core machines seeing the
problem.
- Alfred
DEPRE Gaetan wrote:
So, I guess we'll need these information :
Dual xeon 1core FSB 533 512 KO L2 Cache : Lags
Dual xeon 1core FSB 800 2 Mo L2 Cache : Lags but after a few hours the
server is running
Dual xeon 2cores 4 Mo Cache : No more lags
Debian Etch 2.6.20.1 on each box.
Could the CPU's cache be responsible (in part) of this lag problem ?
-----Message d'origine-----
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Rónai
György Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2007 17:53
À : [email protected]
Objet : Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian and FC 5
only ?
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
Debian Sarge 3.1 with 2.6.16.27 = lag.
Locutus
J.Miribel írta:
Lets update then:
So far:
Debian
Sarge - Lag (1/1 report)
Etch - Lag (1/1 report)
Fedora
FC 4 - To be determined (1/2 reports lag)
FC 5 - No lag ( 2/2 reports)
FC 6 - Lag (1/1 report)
Slackware - No lag (1 report)
Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ?
There are not only 2 guys around using debian nor FC5/6 and hosting
srcds ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ye the FC 5 had USER_HZ set to 1000, Running AMD 64 Athlon
3800+ And no problems with are 100 tick or any of the 66
tick we had.
Azhibberd
----- Original Message Follows -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Re: Lag since 3/13/07 on debian
(sarge) only ?
Date: 19-Mar-2007 14:18:11 GMT
Quoting "J.Miribel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[4]:
So far:
Debian
Sarge - Lag
Etch - Lag
Fedora
FC 5 - No lag
FC 6 - Lag
Anyone else ? Or anyone experiencing opposite results ?
Slackware running 2.6.20, no Preemption, timer freq
1000hz Source running at 100 tic
No lag issues.
Jeff Love
Burgh Gaming
I should also mention this is SMP on dual 32bit AMD Athlon
MP 2800
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the
list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[5]
==========================================================
==============
This email has been scanned for viruses and inappropriate
content
==========================================================
==============
---------------------TAW Signature---------------------
Any problems or inquiries feel free to contact me
LTC_Azhibberd [HL 1OPS] [Server Staff]
Aaron T Hibberd
Contact info:
Xfire: Azhibberd
Msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
========================================================================
This email has been sent from the West Berks LEA. If you have
cause for complaint regarding the content of this email please
contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[9]
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[10]
===References:===
1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
3. mailto:[email protected]
4. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
6. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
7. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
8. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
9. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
10. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
