Regardless of the e-penis waving, there are other, faster processors
than P3s that are effected by this bug. They're obviously not
publisting their to-do list, so I think the best we can do is make
sure our voice is heard in a constructive manner.
Quoting Kevin Karan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
It is an HP LH3 Netserver with 2 1ghz P3 Xeon processors. This machine was
originally used as an university windows domain controller for over 400
stations. Please don't get uppity with me when you have no idea what you are
talking about.
On 10/7/07, ics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could you define "server grade hardware" aka list it, because i'm having
a really hard time imagining your 1 GHz (even if its dual) server
running 4x16 slot CS Source servers. Unless of course, they are empty or
none of them is full.
-ics
Kevin Karan kirjoitti:
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> We are talking about server grade hardware, not a P4 you slapped
together
> for $400 bucks. My Dual 1ghz P3 system can handle 4 16 slot CS:S servers
> rock solid.
>
> On 10/7/07, Evaldas Žilinskas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> How do you run SRCDS stable on P3? I mean, what kind of hardware do you
>> have? I have few P4s with 3ghz ant HT, but one 24slot dods server
runing
>> ant
>> 66tick and ~200fps is maximum what can I get. I mean, isn't a time to
>> R.I.P.
>> some old hardware? 'cause soon we'll be blaming valve for getting low
fps
>> on
>> durons 700mhz :)
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 3:13 AM
>> Subject: [hlds_linux] So.. p3 support for linux binary? yes/no please
>>
>>
>>
>>> A lot of us have fast, server-grade P3 servers. Can we please get an
>>> official word on whether the Linux binary will support this hardware,
or
>>> are we wasting our time? Like others have pointed out, the Windows
SRCDS
>>> doesn't have this requirement.
>>>
>>> I just want a clear answer on this so I can assess my options. I will
>>> likely just abandon TF2 hosting personally, as I cannot afford to
>>> replace all my machines at this time -- others may choose to purchase
>>> new hardware. But at least give us the data we need to make this
>>> decision! My trusty P3 servers are fast enough to run this game with
>>> the maxplayers I have in mind, and did so for CS:S for years now.
>>>
>>> I understand the game is essentially beta, and I am happy to wait for
a
>>> fix. I just want to know if one is forthcoming or not. Looking through
>>> archives of this list, I'm seeing very conflicting information about
>>> this issue. On person says this isn't intended, Alfred seems to be
>>> saying we're SOL. I hope this isn't true, I'm very excited about
hosting
>>> this game.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your time!
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> cj_
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>>> please visit:
>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>
>>
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
--
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
