Monk is absolutely right. The two most important things are that you have a kernel that supports hrtimers and that you have the hardware to support it. Of course, further action can be taken to make the FPS even more stable, however, this requires programming knowledge and this mailing list isn't the place for it. Here is the graph of our server (debian with hrtimers and a special coded library) http://www.fpsmeter.org/p,view;15663.html
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <[email protected]> wrote: > If you was fine before you heard about the 1000fps thing, I think you > shouldnt bother. > The difference between stable ~250 and 1000 fps is almost zero from > the players perspective, but requires higher cpu cost, so you can have > fewer server on the same box. > just my 2c > > Tyrael > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Nevermore<[email protected]> wrote: > > Very insteresting thread! > > > > I run a lot of servers in the same box with stock debian kernel. > > Wich optimization is suitable for me? > > > > > > Thank you all! > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- Seth Schultz _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
