Why on earth is everybody setting their tic to 66? Is something wrong? Or
bad drugs? -I've been out of the loop for a week or so.

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:20 PM,
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Send hlds_linux mailing list submissions to
>        [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of hlds_linux digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. srcds rate settings (Adam Bogacz)
>   2. Re: srcds rate settings (Ulrich Block)
>   3. Re: srcds rate settings (D3vilfish - Simiancage.org)
>   4. Re: srcds rate settings (D3vilfish - Simiancage.org)
>   5. OB first Impressions (D3vilfish - Simiancage.org)
>   6. Testing (Please Disregard) ( [email protected] )
>   7. Re: Testing (Please Disregard) (E3pO)
>   8. Re: Testing (Please Disregard) (Nathan Nagato)
>   9. Re: Testing (Please Disregard) (Shane Arnold)
>  10. Re: Testing (Please Disregard) (Crazy Canucks)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:05:16 +0200
> From: Adam Bogacz <[email protected]>
> Subject: [hlds_linux] srcds rate settings
> To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> so with new fixed tickrate how rate settings should look like ?
>
> i have this:
>
> fps_max 500
> sv_minrate 25000
> sv_maxrate 25000
> sv_maxupdaterate 66
> sv_minupdaterate 66
> sv_maxcmdrate 66
> sv_mincmdrate 66
>
> regards [email protected]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mistrzowski konkurs - wygraj nowoczesny telefon komorkowy!
> Sprawdz >>> http://linkint.pl/f2745
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:22:43 +0200
> From: Ulrich Block <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] srcds rate settings
> To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> If you are a rude admin that does not care that many people need to
> adjust their netsettings to their fps/bandwidth yes.
> If you take in count that the client fps are lower with orangebox and
> you need to give the users same space to adjust:
>
> sv_minrate 15000
> sv_maxrate 40000
> sv_maxupdaterate 66
> sv_minupdaterate 40
> sv_maxcmdrate 66
> sv_mincmdrate 35
>
>
>
> Adam Bogacz schrieb:
> > so with new fixed tickrate how rate settings should look like ?
> >
> > i have this:
> >
> > fps_max 500
> > sv_minrate 25000
> > sv_maxrate 25000
> > sv_maxupdaterate 66
> > sv_minupdaterate 66
> > sv_maxcmdrate 66
> > sv_mincmdrate 66
> >
> > regards [email protected]
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Mistrzowski konkurs - wygraj nowoczesny telefon komorkowy!
> > Sprawdz >>> http://linkint.pl/f2745
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:44:31 +0100
> From: "D3vilfish - Simiancage.org" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] srcds rate settings
> To: "'Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list'"
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <000001cb13de$0c7d3230$257796...@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
> Everybody I've spoken to so far has the same fps as pre OB, I currently get
> with vsync off and multi core support on anywhere between 250 to 650 fps my
> stress test was 381.33fps on a 4890gfx with win7.
> Anyone getting less than playable fps should be looking at a new pc tbh
> imho.
> As for bandwidth I think we all agree rate hacking is worst than wall
> hacking, why people join servers that they have a bad ping/connection to is
> their own fault!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ulrich
> Block
> Sent: 24 June 2010 21:23
> To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] srcds rate settings
>
> If you are a rude admin that does not care that many people need to
> adjust their netsettings to their fps/bandwidth yes.
> If you take in count that the client fps are lower with orangebox and
> you need to give the users same space to adjust:
>
> sv_minrate 15000
> sv_maxrate 40000
> sv_maxupdaterate 66
> sv_minupdaterate 40
> sv_maxcmdrate 66
> sv_mincmdrate 35
>
>
>
> Adam Bogacz schrieb:
> > so with new fixed tickrate how rate settings should look like ?
> >
> > i have this:
> >
> > fps_max 500
> > sv_minrate 25000
> > sv_maxrate 25000
> > sv_maxupdaterate 66
> > sv_minupdaterate 66
> > sv_maxcmdrate 66
> > sv_mincmdrate 66
> >
> > regards [email protected]
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Mistrzowski konkurs - wygraj nowoczesny telefon komorkowy!
> > Sprawdz >>> http://linkint.pl/f2745
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:43:27 +0100
> From: "D3vilfish - Simiancage.org" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] srcds rate settings
> To: "'Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list'"
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <000101cb13e6$4809d1c0$d81d75...@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
> Sorry double post from win32 meant to put this on Linux listing as I've
> always ran nix servers.
>
> As a community we derive from back in the days of cs1.2/3/4/5.
> When Source first came to our doors we embraced and shunned it at the same
> time, we all loved cs1.x but knew source was the way forwards.
> So here we are source gone OB, love it or hate it, it's the way forwards.
> Lots will argue the 66 tick rule, the numerous faults and god knows what
> else but you know after 6 years of running and playing servers im quite
> happy css finaly made OB.
> It carries Valves support for hopefully plugging holes in what was a dated
> engine.
> This brings me to one observation that I have seen since CSS going OB.
> We run our servers as secure as possible, file perms set to a diff user,
> pure list kept tight and whatever sm/mm plugins are available to keep the
> servers safe. We have a good group of active admins with experience to
> clock
> dodgy players BUT Since last night we have seen a huge amount of players
> join then disconnect, maybe they have bad ping, maybe they don't like that
> pure list disabling skins but I have the feeling that nobody realised how
> many hackers there were out there.
> We used to ban maybe 2 to 5 players a day with the old engine over 3
> servers
> with dodgy/obvious hacks.
> Today we have banned 1 in 24hrs.
> I know they will eventually script there sad lives back into cheating but
> for now it's just a slice of heaven.
> So for the first time in my life I commend valve on bringing CSS up to date
> and making it a viable game that will have more attention the same as TF2 &
> L4D2.
> As for gaming as a client I'm now 37 and past my sell by date for all these
> younguns that have lightening quick reactions.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:50:33 +0100
> From: "D3vilfish - Simiancage.org" <[email protected]>
> Subject: [hlds_linux] OB first Impressions
> To: "'Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list'"
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <000201cb13e7$45c8c5f0$d15a51...@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
> Double sorry meant to change Subject!
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:33:06 -0400
> From: " [email protected] " <[email protected]>
> Subject: [hlds_linux] Testing (Please Disregard)
> To:
>        [email protected],
> [email protected]
> Message-ID:
>        <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Testing
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:41:06 -0400
> From: E3pO <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Testing (Please Disregard)
> To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
>        <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Disregarded. ;)
>
> On Jun 24, 2010 6:37 PM, "[email protected]" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Testing
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:46:10 -0400
> From: Nathan Nagato <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Testing (Please Disregard)
> To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Disregarding your disregard. :)
>
> On 6/24/2010 6:41 PM, E3pO wrote:
> > Disregarded. ;)
> >
> > On Jun 24, 2010 6:37 PM, "[email protected]"<
> > [email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> > Testing
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 07:35:13 +0800
> From: Shane Arnold <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Testing (Please Disregard)
> To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>  - Sent from my iPhone somewhere near Pluto.
>
> On 25/06/2010 6:46 AM, Nathan Nagato wrote:
> > Disregarding your disregard. :)
> >
> > On 6/24/2010 6:41 PM, E3pO wrote:
> >
> >> Disregarded. ;)
> >>
> >> On Jun 24, 2010 6:37 PM, "[email protected]"<
> >> [email protected]>   wrote:
> >>
> >> Testing
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> >> please visit:
> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:20:17 -0300
> From: Crazy Canucks <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Testing (Please Disregard)
> To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> That would make it a plutonic relationship...
>
> On 24/06/2010 8:35 PM, Shane Arnold wrote:
> >    - Sent from my iPhone somewhere near Pluto.
> >
> > On 25/06/2010 6:46 AM, Nathan Nagato wrote:
> >
> >> Disregarding your disregard. :)
> >>
> >> On 6/24/2010 6:41 PM, E3pO wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Disregarded. ;)
> >>>
> >>> On Jun 24, 2010 6:37 PM, "[email protected]"<
> >>> [email protected]>    wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Testing
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> >>> please visit:
> >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
>
>
> End of hlds_linux Digest, Vol 28, Issue 43
> ******************************************
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to