It's really doubtful that you would notice any difference. Swapping task
from core to core has some overhead associated with it, but not that
much. It doesn't happen enough to really make a difference. I watch
system monitor from within xfce, and my tasks that are maxing out a core
swap every couple of seconds, while other maxed out tasks stay in the
same core indefinitely - I'm not sure what triggers a cpu swap, nor am I
sure if different cpu schedulers handle swapping differently (it stands
to reason that they do).
You would probably get better performance by selecting a cpu scheduler
with low overhead. Most distros default to CFQ, try switching to the
deadline scheduler. But again, I doubt you would notice any difference.
On 06/03/2011 07:02 PM, C Szabo wrote:
Hey dudes!
Is it better for HLDS to assign each HLDS to one core?
Running 12 HLDS on 12 cores.
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
