On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 03:17:56PM -0500, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > Is there any reason not to upgrade to 4.1.0 in the dev branch, thus > avoiding the need for any added patches?
No reasons exist not to, but there are few reasons why it won't happen instantly. I do not think it prudent to use 4.1 with glibc-2.3.6. gcc devs have said as much and I am in no position to disagree. The other factors are time and available help from the community building, testing, recommending things, etc. FWIW, I am planning on cutting a gcc-4.1/glibc-CVS branch when I get back from England. Since all of this is considered alpha, I have no qualms getting a head start on the future of the toolchain. The only holdup is a possible change in the layout of the HLFS repository. It may get moved to the LFS repository for ease of administration, but that is not set in stone at this point. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
