Alle 18:36, mercoledì 21 giugno 2006, hai scritto: > > BLFS is the right continuing to HLFS ? > > can I apply BLFS without any changes ? > > Except where it barfs :-). excuse me , can you explain meaning of barfs ?
> There are a few gotchas to that process. If you have > CONFIG_PAX_NOELFRELOCS and randomised positioning of executables, then > your executables can land anywhere and are not allowed to move to where > they want to. can you help me to know more about PAX and Grsec parameters meanings ? > This is a problem for: static libraries - The ones ending in .a, but > it's never quite that simple; It is a problem for assembler which has > hard addresses in the binary. Gentoo-hardened used a check-textrel > script with readelf -d |grep TEXTREL as the key active line to check > libs and executables. > > You have to strictly ban all precompiled code. No downloading of > binaries - suffer with the source. > > Expect fun with DRI, Mesa, & multimedia stuff where coders seem less > fussy about form than performance. The hlfs stuff uses the line > > CFLAGS += -fpic -fPIC what mean ? > or somesuch added to Makefiles and it goes on after all the other > CFLAGS. It ensures the options are passed. > > When you do barf, don't expect too much help. You're a big boy now :-). no, no, I try only for experimental installation > And fix it up, tell us how in one neat mail and we won't flame you :-). I hope, one day.... -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
